Dear Sir,
Dr.T.V.Gopalakrishnan
Dear Sir,
Good Roads also a matter of economic, social Justice
This refers to your editorial Bengaluru seeks intent, not excuses Deccan Herald (oct,14).Due to the pathetic condition of Bangalore’s roads ,the daily hardships citizens endure, the loss of time, money , health and the reputation of the City and its people suffer are something unavoidable to a great extent if the intent instead of excuses as rightly put in the editorial is in place. Provision of good roads and their upkeep is not merely an infrastructural need—it is a form of inevitable economic and social justice. Roads are the lifelines for mobility, essential services, and economic activity, while also serving as a mirror of governance standards. Smooth, safe, and well-maintained roads make life not only comfortable but also dignified, reflecting a government’s commitment to citizens’ welfare. People miss a lot of their economic, social, emotional, sentimental, precious time, and other small small desires and limited aspirations for want of the very essential movements in the absence of safe, comfortable and very inevitable social visits within the city. Roads play a key role in maintaining not only the social connections but also keeping the people in good mental and physical health conditions is a ground reality which cannot be denied to them on flimsy grounds.The leaders cannot ignore their essential leadership capabilities and these are all perhaps their memorable contributions worthy of showcasing their image, reputation and proven popularity.
The responsibility, however, cannot rest solely on the government. Citizens too must recognise their duty in avoiding / preventing hazards, potholes and damage by refraining from dumping garbage, construction debris, or unauthorised parking / violation of traffic rules that choke free movement. Civic indiscipline adds to chaos, delays, and needless suffering.
With better coordination between the administration and the public, Bangalore can have durable, quality roads. Proper governance and responsible civic behaviour can ensure optimum use of resources and prevent wastage of time, money, and effort. The man-hours lost in commuting, and the mental, physical, emotional, and financial stress citizens undergo due to poor roads, is beyond imagination—and must no longer be ignored. Corruption and corrupt practices in the general administration of public goods and services if avoided by thoughts, words and deeds by all and any associated can have only pleasant, lasting and ever relishing memories. Good roads ensure not only the welfare of people but also reflect on the sensitivity of the Governance system in vogue and prove to be the best and easiest way to earn the goodwill of the people.
T V Gopalakrishnan
(Personal views)
Bangaluru.
( Modified version of this letter is published in Deccan Herald dt 15/10/25).
The banking sector in general—and public sector banks (PSBs) in particular—has long operated in a manner that drains depositors’ and taxpayers’ money, aided by a nexus of politicians, bureaucrats, bankers, and errant borrowers under a relaxed regulatory environment. Former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee candidly stated in the 1990s that “NPAs are nothing but loot.” The system has known this truth for decades, yet the problem persists despite getting some enhanced legal support as of now again at a high cost in terms of time and money - just because depositors and taxpayers silently bear the burden. Periodic bailouts follow whenever the crisis threatens financial stability.
Depositors have few safe avenues for savings beyond banks, and alternatives like gold, real estate, or other commodities often serve as conduits for unaccounted money and speculative activity rather than productive investment.
A lasting solution to the NPA problem requires discipline—both among bank managements and their borrowers—and an independent, efficient regulator free from political or bureaucratic interference. Such a model was proposed as early as 2004 in Management of NPAs in PSBs by Dr. T.V. Gopalakrishnan, published by the Indian Institute of Banking and Finance, with a foreword by Dr. C. Rangarajan, former RBI Governor and Chairman of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council. The book proposed the creation of a Precautionary Margin Reserve Fund (PMRF)—a shared responsibility mechanism between lenders and borrowers—to contain NPAs, incentivise good borrowers, and penalise poor credit behaviour.
Despite professional acclaim and recommendations for pilot implementation, the model was never adopted. Had it been, the banking system would likely have been far stronger today—reducing NPAs, preserving depositor confidence, and preventing the “twin balance sheet” problem that has repeatedly strained India’s financial stability. The recurring and accrual loss to the economy because of the NPAs is something of a very high magnitude which cannot be easily set aside to ensure and realise the the status of fast growing economy.
Dr. Rangarajan observed in his foreword (2 July 2004):
“High levels of NPAs affect profitability, liquidity and solvency of banks, ultimately impacting financial stability itself. The author has made several suggestions to contain their growth. One such idea—the Precautionary Margin Reserve Fund—envisages both borrowers and lenders contributing to a common fund. Only an efficient banking system can fulfil the socio-economic goals set for it, and this book explores precisely that.”
The RBI’s recent move to introduce minimum provisioning floors (0.25–5% for performing assets, based on risk class) is, in essence, a partial acceptance of this idea. The PMRF concept—built on mathematical objectivity and fairness—could have become an inbuilt corrective mechanism to identify good borrowers, discipline defaulters, and safeguard the interests of all stakeholders without bias or undue discretion.
Ultimately, depositors’ money—the core raw material of banking—must not be used to subsidise inefficiency or moral hazard. A system that compels prudent behaviour, transparency, and ethical accountability from both lenders and borrowers is not just sound economics—it is social justice.
Loka Samastha Sukhino Bhavanthu.
Levy Precautionary Margin Reserves as PROVISIONS from bad borrowers to save the bank depositors and tax payers from Bad debts.
According to the news report “RBI proposes 100% Bank Provisions”, (ET dated 8th Oct), the central bank’s proposal to introduce minimum provisioning floors ranging from 0.25% to 5% for performing assets—based on asset class and credit risk stage—is a prudent though long overdue step to save depositors and tax payers from subsidising the default borrowers Hope this proposed provision is levied from the borrowers to have a built in mechanism to prevent the formation of NPAs.
Strengthening bank balance sheets through disciplined provisioning and promoting credit quality are essential for maintaining the health of the financial system and safeguarding the interests of all stakeholders, including the government and depositors. Such measures will provide the much-needed foundation for sustainable economic growth.
The Prime Minister’s vision of transforming India into a developed, Atmanirbhar Bharat by 2047 can be realistically achieved through these sensible and sound RBI initiatives, complemented by ongoing fiscal discipline—such as containing fiscal deficits while rationalising Direct Taxes and GST 2.0.
However, these financial measures must be supported by robust governance standards across institutions and public utilities, prioritising ethics, transparency, and welfare. Ensuring low food inflation, a bearable cost of living, equitable wealth distribution, and measurable trickle-down effects of growth are vital. Equally crucial is improving the quality of data on employment, tax compliance, and wealth creation to guide policy decisions effectively and equitably.
Dear Sir,