The editorial Poverty of Statistics is very apt. The Planning Commission's submission to the Supreme Court that a person who earns Rs 32( not 31 as indicated ) in urban area and Rs 27 in rural area should be treated above poverty line only reflects poor understanding of the poverty, or of the value of the rupee, or the inflation level prevailing in the economy, or the credibility of data by its Members. It also reflects poorly, the concern that the Members have for the people particularly the poor.It is okay if these poor people have access to some canteens maintained by the Govt and the food is made available at these rates.It is time to admit that there is no accuracy of data with regard to the poor people and the method of arriving at the poverty level has no consensus. The amount of subsidies and various poverty linked programmes do not benefit the poor are common knowledge. The UID is the only hope left now and hope some lasting solution to remove poverty will be found soon.
Dr.T.V.Gopalakrishnan.
(This appeared in The Hindu-Business Line Dt 27/09/11).
No comments:
Post a Comment