The argument that the abolition of STT on cash and derivative
transactions in listed instruments could enhance volumes and improve
market depth does not carry conviction and is not a solution either to
reduce transaction cost or improve the revenues though capital gains
tax instead of STT.The convenience of collecting STT and the
inconvenience of collecting capital gains tax with all its
disadvantages of tracking the transactions and arriving at the capital
gains tax with room for ever ending disputes etc have to be weighed by
the Govt before removal of STT. Further, the capital gains can be
adjusted against capital loss which also can be disputed adding to the
workload of both the IT administration and assesees. No doubt STT needs
a flexible approach and this can vary for individuals and institutions
with different cut off limits in the volume of transactions.To reduce
the transaction cost, the brokerage,demat charges etc can be reduced
considerably.
(This is in response to the editorial Costless tarding appeared in Business line dated 25/2/11).
(This is in response to the editorial Costless tarding appeared in Business line dated 25/2/11).
No comments:
Post a Comment