Sunday, June 30, 2013

Canara Bank, Interest Rate and high cost of funds.

The bank blames RBI for not cutting down interest rates. It is absurd and amounts to passing on the buck to RBI for bank's own failure in managing the balance sheet.The admission that bank is not able to mobilise adequate deposits at low rate of interest is a major reason for high cost of funds. Further, keeping high level of NPAs is another reason for bank's failure to reduce the cost of funds. Depending on borrowed funds at high cost to do banking business and maintaining high NPAs without disciplining the willful defaulters will naturally add to the cost of funds and bank  cannot blame RBI for that. It is unfortunate that bank is taking shelter blaming  RBI   for its miserable failure in Asset Liability Management. The point that bank is paying more on some deposits than what it fetches on advances is a serious issue and these advances and deposits need to be investigated. Unless and until there are some under cuttings to favor the favored borrowers  such a thing cannot happen. The NIM of the bank is also not comparable with its peers only indicates that there is some serious deficiency some where in the management of assets and liabilities.The move of the bank to reduce bulk deposit is appreciable and it will automatically bring down the cost of deposits. The answers given by the Chairman  in his interview with Business line are not very convincing to justify its comparatively low NIM, high NPAs, high cost of deposits and over all position of the bank.Reserve Bank  being a monetary authority of the Country has a different agenda and the policies pursued by it also factor in the banks' profitability, cost of funds,  interest rates et al. The banks fail RBI in transmitting its monetary policies in letter and spirit is an issue to be seriously debated by the banks in India.

Dr.T.V.Gopalakrishnan

(This comment  in a slightly modified manner appeared in Business Line dated 1/7/13 in response to Canara Bank's CMD's remark that Interest Rates cannot be reduced as the cost of funds is very high )

No comments: